Out-of-Body FAQ
What is animism?
A school of thought has grown up within parapsychology, and around
its fringes, which takes very seriously the idea of death being
an OBE in which one did not succeed in getting back into one's body.
Gauld [Gau82] refers to this school of thought as the 'animistic'
school (anima = soul), 'animism' being the view that every human
mind, whether in its before death or after death state 'is essentially
and inseparably bound up with some kind of extended quasi-physical
vehicle, which is not normally perceptible to the senses of human
beings in their present life' [Bro62]. An argument which one commonly
hears from members of the animistic school runs as follows: OBEs
and near-death experiences are, so far as we can tell, universal.
They have been reported from many different parts of the world and
in many different historical eras. The experiences of the persons
concerned therefore must reflect genuine features of the human constitution;
for we cannot possibly suppose that they derive from a common stream
of religious tradition or folk-belief -- the societies from which
they have been reported are too widely separated in space and time
for the common-origin idea to be a serious possibility.
The most powerful shot in the the animist's locker remains, however,
still to be mentioned. There are some cases -- by no means a negligible
number -- in which a person who is undergoing an OBE, and finds
himself at or 'projects' himself to a particular spot distant from
his physical body, has been seen at that very spot by some person
present there. Such cases are generally known as 'reciprocal' cases.
Thus the animist, starting from his study of OBEs and NDEs, claims
to have direct evidence that after death we remain the conscious
individuals that we always have been and that the 'vehicle' of our
surviving memories and other psychological dispositions is a surrogate
body whose properties (other perhaps than that of being malleable
by thought) are, he would admit, largely unknown.
In addition to taking OBEs and NDEs as themselves evidence for
survival, the animist might well feel able to offer the following
argument in support of regarding a further class of phenomena as
evidence for survival of consciousness following physical death.
There is in the literature on apparitions a substantial sprinkling
of cases of apparitions of deceased persons, some of which have
been seen by witnesses who did not know the deceased in life. An
extensive statistical investigation by the late professor Hornell
Hart [Har56] strongly suggests that apparitions of the dead and
the phantasms of living 'projectors' in reciprocal cases are, as
classes, indistinguishable from each other in what may be called
their 'external characteristics' -- such as whether the figure was
solid, dressed in ordinary clothes, seen by more than one person,
whether it spoke, adjusted itself to its physical surroundings,
etc. Now we know that in reciprocal cases the phantasms of the projector
is in some sense a center of or a vehicle of consciousness, namely
the consciousness of the projector. Since apparitions of the dead
and of living projectors manifestly belong to the same class of
objects or events, we may properly infer that since the apparitions
of living projectors are vehicles for the consciousness of the person
in question, this must be true of apparitions of the dead also.
Hence the consciousness of deceased persons survives and may either
have, or make use of, a kind of body.
Go to the Next
chapter
Go to the Previous
Chapter
Go to the Out-of-Body FAQ Index
Copyright Jouni A. Smed
|