Out-of-Body FAQ
What are ESP, PK and psi?
'Extrasensory perception' (ESP) is a term coined by Dr. J. B. Rhine
of Duke University. It covers any instance of the apparent acquisition
of non- inferential knowledge of matters of fact without the use
of the known sense organs.
ESP is usually said to have three varieties: 'telepathy,' in which
the knowledge is of events in another person's mind, 'clairvoyance,'
in which the knowledge is of physical objects or states of affairs;
and 'precognition' (telepathic or clairvoyant), where the knowledge
relates to happenings still in the future. The word 'knowledge'
is, however, not entirely appropriate, for there may be telepathic
or clairvoyant 'interaction,' in which a person's mental state or
actions may be influenced by an external state of affairs, though
he does not 'know' or 'cognize' it.
Another American term is 'psychokinesis' (PK), the direct influence
of mental events on physical events external to the agent's body.
'Psi' (from the Greek letter) is 'a general term to identify personal
factors or processes in nature which transcend accepted laws' [Gay74].
It is sometimes used to cover both ESP and PK.
What theories have been put forward to account for the OBE?
The notion of the human double has a long and colorful history.
Plato gave us an early idea. He believed that what we see in this
life is only a dim reflection of what the spirit could see if it
were released from the physical. Imprisoned in a gross physical
body, the spirit is restricted; separated from that body, it would
be able to converse freely with the spirits of the departed, and
see things more clearly. Another idea which can be traced to the
Greeks is that we have second body. The spirit or some subtle body
would be able to see better without its body. Aristotle taught that
the spirit could leave the body and that it is capable of communicating
with the spirits, while Plotinus held that all souls must be separable
from their physical bodies. This 'doctrine of the subtle body' runs
through Western tradition.
Homer regarded man as a composite being comprising three distinct
entities, namely the body (soma), the 'psyche,' and the thumos;
this last term is untranslatable, but is always closely associated
with the diaphragm/midriff (phrenes), which was considered to be
the seat of the will and feeling, perhaps even of the intellect.
At this stage (800 - 750 BC) the term psyche had not come to mean
personal soul, but rather it represented the impersonal life-principle
which dwells in the body but which is unrelated to the intellect
and the emotions. A fourth component, the 'image' ('eidolon'), might
also be included in human make-up; it was this aspect of self which
acted and appeared in dreams, where it was considered as a real
figure.
Dionysus' early followers in Thrace reenacted his death and resurrection
in a gruesome ceremony, where they tore a live bull to pieces with
their teeth, and then roamed about the woods shouting frantically.
Later rituals were hardly less barbaric and frenzied; all were calculated
to induce a stage of religious madness or mania. They took place
at night to the accompaniment of loud music and cymbals, thus exciting
the chorus of worshippers who soon joined in with shouts of their
own. Dancing was so violent that no breath was left for singing,
and eventually the worshippers induced through their excesses a
state of such exaltation and rapture that it seemed to them that
the ordinary limits of life had been transcended, that they were
'possessed,' their soul having temporarily left the body. The soul
was in a condition of enthousiasmos (inside the god) and ekstasis
(outside the body); liberated from the confines of the body it enjoyed
communion with the god.
Perhaps the most pervasive idea relating to other bodies is that
on death we leave our physical body and take on some subtler or
higher form. This notion has roots not only in Greek thought and
in much of later philosophy, but also in many religious teachings.
Some Eastern religions include specific doctrines on the forms and
abilities of other bodies and the nature of other worlds; and in
Christianity there are references to a spiritual body. Some religious
works can be seen as preparing the soul for its transition at death.
The Tibetan Book of the Dead, or Bardo Thodol (meaning Liberation
by Hearing on the After-Death Plane) was first committed to writing
in the eighth century AD, although the editor, Dr W. Y. Evans-Wentz,
has no doubt that it represents 'the record of belief of innumerable
generations in a state of existence after death.' It is thought
that its teachings were initially handed down orally, then finally
compiled and recorded by a number of authors. The book is used as
a funeral ritual, and is read out as a guide to the recently deceased.
It contains an elaborate description of the moment of death, the
stages of mind experienced by the deceased at various stages of
post-mortem existence, and the path to liberation or rebirth, as
the case may be.
The Bardo body, also referred to as the desire- or propensity-body,
is formed of matter in an invisible and etheral-like state and is,
in this tradition, believed to be an exact duplicate of the human
body, from which it is separated in the process of death. Retained
in the Bardo body are the consciousness-principle and the psychic
nervous system (the counterpart, for the psychic or Bardo body,
of the physical nervous system of the human body) [Eva60]. Due to
its nature, the Bardo body is able to pass through matter, which
is only solid and impenetrable to the senses, but not to the instruments
of modern physics; and the fact that the conscious self is not embedded
in matter enables it to travel instantly where it desires. Flights
of the imagination become objectively real, the wish comes true.
In his introductions to The Egyptian Book of the Dead -- called
in the language of that people 'Pert Em Hru' ('Emerging by Day')
-- Wallis Budge points out that its chapters 'are a mirror in which
are reflected most of the beliefs of the various races which went
to build up the Egyptians of history.' As all commentators have
hastened to indicate, the Book of the Dead is not a unity but a
collection of chapters of varying lengths and dating from different
ages. A selection of these would be made for the deceased, and would
be copied on the walls of the tomb or inscribed on the sides of
the sarcophagi; or they might even be written on scrolls of papyri
which were then laid within the folds of the bodycloths. The extracts
meant to benefit the deceased in a variety of ways.
In the Egyptian Book of the Dead the perishable physical body,
preservable only by mummification, is called the khat. Next comes
the ka, which is generally translated as 'double,' and is defined
by Wallis Budge as 'an abstract individuality or personality which
possessed the form and attributes of the man to whom it belonged,
and, though its normal dwelling place was in the tomb with the body,
it could wander about at will; it was independent of the man and
could go and dwell in any statue of him.'
The ba, or heart-soul, is depicted as a bird and is often translated
as 'soul.' It is sometimes conceived of as an animating principle
within the body, but elsewhere it is hinted that one only becomes
a ba after death, when it either dwells with the ka in the tomb
or with Ra or Osiris in heaven. The ba is often referred to in connection
with the spiritual soul (khu), which was regarded as imperishable
and existed in the spiritual body (sahu). The sahu was originally
considered to be a more material body, and may have formed a part
of an early and literal view of the resurrection, whereby the sahu,
ba, ka, khaibit (shadow) and ikhu (vital force) all came together
again after 3,000 years, and the man was reanimated. Gradually the
sahu came to be regarded as more spiritual in its compositions,
and the idea of physical resurrection lost its prominence. It was
believed that this sahu was germinated from the physical body, provided
that it was not corrupt, and that the appropriate ceremonies had
been performed by the priests.
The Egyptians agree with the Primitives and the Tibetans in asserting
a form of continued existence after physical death. Their notions
are less psychologically consistent and subtle than those of the
Tibetans, but much more complex and symbolically developed than
those of the Primitives, whom they resemble only in the earliest
stages of their civilisation. Their unique features center round
the overwhelming dread of physical corruption and corresponding
longing for the germination of the indestructible sahu in which
the khu will exist 'for millions and millions of years.'
One of the directly relevant ideas derives from the teachings of
Theosophy. Within a scheme involving several planes and several
bodies, the OBE is interpreted as a projection of the 'astral body'
from the physical body. Theosophical ideas have influenced the thinking
and terminology of many OBE researchers since many people reporting
OBEs have found terms like 'astral projection' which derive from
Theosophy to be useful in describing their experiences. Other researchers,
however, find such terminology and the model it has been devised
to describe to be unnecessarily biased in favor of a certain 'esoteric'
interpretation of the actual experiences.
The idea that we have a double also appears in popular mythology.
Often these doubles have sinister overtones, or are associated with
the darker side of the psyche, but usually they are supposed to
be quite harmless. These phenomena seem to be related to the OBE
in that they involve a double, but there the resemblance ends.
Dean Sheils [She78] compared the beliefs of over 60 different cultures
by referring to special files kept for anthropological research.
Of 54 cultures for which some information was reported, 25 (or 46%)
claimed that most or all people could travel outside the physical
body under certain conditions. A further 23 (or 43%) claimed that
a few of their number were able to do so, and only three cultures
expressed no belief in anything of this nature. In a further three
cultures the possibility of OBEs was admitted but the proportion
of people who could experience it was not given. From this evidence,
we can conclude that some form of a belief in out-of-body experiences
is very common in various cultures.
Apparently, as many cultures interpret dreams as OBEs as those
which do not. The notion that one may induce an OBE deliberately
is not entirely absent from the cultures included by Sheils, though
it is usually confined to certain types of people. Often only shamans
can achieve OBEs, sometimes by using special drugs or methods for
inducing a trance. Of those cultures described by Sheils, there
were several in which there was a common belief that the soul could
travel in earthly places, while in others the general belief was
that the soul could only move in the world of the dead or spirits,
and in others both kinds of soul travel were accepted.
There are stories of bilocation in which the physical body exists
and acts in two separate places at once. But physical effects in
OBE are rare. Also related to OBEs are the phenomena of traveling
clairvoyance, ESP projection and remote viewing. 'Traveling clairvoyance'
was used to describe a form of clairvoyance in which a medium or
sensitive seemed to observe a distant place, therefore it included
both OBEs and experiences in which the clairvoyant 'perceived' the
distant scene but without any experience of leaving the body. In
both 'traveling clairvoyance' and 'ESP projection' the occurrence
of ESP is presupposed, but the experience of leaving the body is
not. Remote viewing is a recent and better-defined term. Typically
a subject describes or draws his impressions while an 'outbound
experimenter' visits randomly selected remote locations. Later the
descriptions and the locations are matched up. Remote viewing has
often been compared with OBEs, and sometimes subjects who can have
OBEs are used in remote viewing experiments.
Many people have argued that the OBE itself is some kind of dream
and involves no double other than an imaginary one. However, an
ordinary dream does not have those important features of the experient
seeming to leave the body and being conscious of perceiving things
as they occur. In this sense OBEs are better compared with lucid
dreams, which are dreams in which the sleeper realizes, at the time,
that he or she is dreaming. In such an experience, the sleeper may
become perfectly conscious in the dream, which makes the experience
very much like an OBE.
The experience of seeing one's own double has been called 'autoscopy'
or 'autoscopic hallucinations.' Here again the double is not the
'real' or conscious person. It is seen as another self, but the
original self still appears the most real. In the OBE it is the
'other' which seems most alive.
It has been argued that the OBE is an hallucination, and any other
body or double is likewise hallucinatory. There are in fact many
similarities between some kinds of hallucinations and OBEs. Among
other experiences difficult to disentangle from OBEs are a variety
of religious and transcendental experiences. People may feel that
they have grown very large or very small, becoming one with the
Universe or God. Everything is seen in a new perspective, and may
seem 'real' for the very first time. It is difficult to draw a line
between a religious experience and an OBE and any line one does
draw may seem artificial or arbitrary.
Go to the Next
chapter
Go to the Previous Chapter
Go to the Out-of-Body FAQ Index
Copyright Jouni A. Smed
|